This page provides gas consumption benchmarks for TON wallet contracts,Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://companyname-a7d5b98e-gas-usage.mintlify.app/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
measured in both sandbox (local testing) and on-chain (testnet) environments.
Single transfers
Gas costs vary between sandbox and on-chain due to different VM configurations, but the relative comparison between wallet versions remains consistent.Batch transfers
| Wallet Version | Sandbox (gas) | On-chain (gas) | Notes (12 messages are chosen for simplicity) |
|---|---|---|---|
| V3 | 14,760 | - | Supports up to 4 messages per transaction |
| V5 | 11,392 | 10,892 | Efficient with batch compared to V3/V4 |
| Highload V3 | 7,956 | 7,911 | Less gas, but uses 2 transactions for batch |
Total cost
| Wallet Version | Single Transfer | 4 Messages | 12 Messages | 50 Messages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V3 | 0.0022648 TON | 0.0048448 TON | N/A | |
| V4 | 0.0023872 TON | 0.0049704 TON | N/A | |
| V5 | 0.0031356 TON | 0.0059768 TON | 0.0137208 TON | 0.05052 TON |
| Highload V3 | 0.0036404 TON | 0.0158308 TON | 0.0521892 TON |
- V5 has higher gas overhead for single transfers (+65% vs V3) but becomes efficient with batch operations. Supports up to 255 messages per transaction.
- Highload V3 is expensive for single transfers but becomes highly efficient at scale:
- Gas cost doesn’t change with the number of messages in a batch
- 100 messages: ~79 gas/msg
- Designed for handling thousands of transactions
Methodology
Sandbox measurements:
Framework: Blueprint + @ton/sandboxWallets: implementations from @ton/ton (V3R2, V4, V5R1) and Highload V3 sources
Test scenario: Simple transfer of 0.01 TON with
PAY_GAS_SEPARATELY mode
On-chain measurements:
Network: TON testnetWallets: Same implementations as sandbox
Measurement: Actual transaction gas consumption from explorer data
Use case recommendations
Based on cost-effectiveness: For retail users (1-10 transactions/day):- Use V3 or V4 — most cost-effective for single transfers (2,994 gas baseline)
- V5 adds 65% gas overhead for single transfers but provides modern features
- Total cost difference negligible for low volume; choose based on feature needs
- Use V5 for batch operations — 6% savings vs V3 for 12-message batches
- Single V5 batch (255 msgs) more efficient than multiple V3/V4 batches
- V5 supports up to 255 messages per transaction vs V3/V4 limit of 4
- Highload V3 becomes efficient with large batches
- Designed for exchanges and payment processors (different processing approach)
- Gas cost remains constant regardless of batch size (unlike V3/V4/V5)
- Note: Uses 2-transaction approach resulting in ~1.8x higher forward fees
- Highload V3: 7956 gas per batch (flat cost regardless of batch size)
- V5: ~1,069 gas/message for 12 messages (scales down with larger batches)
- V3/V4: ~1,230 gas/message (limited to 4 messages per batch)
Code examples
Check gas-research and tolk-bench projects for code examples. Key features of the gas-research testing suite:- Comprehensive gas and fee breakdown analysis
- Automated benchmarking across all wallet versions
- Fee calculation helpers for precise cost analysis