Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://companyname-a7d5b98e-gas-usage.mintlify.app/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

This page provides gas consumption benchmarks for TON wallet contracts,
measured in both sandbox (local testing) and on-chain (testnet) environments.

Single transfers

Gas costs vary between sandbox and on-chain due to different VM configurations, but the relative comparison between wallet versions remains consistent.
Wallet VersionSandbox (gas)On-chain (gas)Notes
V32,9942,494Baseline, most efficient for single transfers
V43,3082,808+10% vs V3, adds plugin support
V54,9394,439+65% vs V3, supports gasless & batch
Highload V36,2006,200+107% vs V3, but highly efficient for batches

Batch transfers

Wallet VersionSandbox (gas)On-chain (gas)Notes (12 messages are chosen for simplicity)
V314,760-Supports up to 4 messages per transaction
V511,39210,892Efficient with batch compared to V3/V4
Highload V37,9567,911Less gas, but uses 2 transactions for batch

Total cost

Wallet VersionSingle Transfer4 Messages12 Messages50 Messages
V30.0022648 TON0.0048448 TONN/A
V40.0023872 TON0.0049704 TONN/A
V50.0031356 TON0.0059768 TON0.0137208 TON0.05052 TON
Highload V30.0036404 TON0.0158308 TON0.0521892 TON
Key insights:
  • V5 has higher gas overhead for single transfers (+65% vs V3) but becomes efficient with batch operations. Supports up to 255 messages per transaction.
  • Highload V3 is expensive for single transfers but becomes highly efficient at scale:
    • Gas cost doesn’t change with the number of messages in a batch
    • 100 messages: ~79 gas/msg
    • Designed for handling thousands of transactions
"Wallet V3 batch 4 messages": {
    "gas": 4920,
    "compute_fee_nanoton": 1968000,
    "storage_fee_nanoton": 0,
    "import_fee_nanoton": 1276800,
    "total_fwd_fees_nanoton": 1600000,
    "forward_only_nanoton": 1066676,
    "action_fee_nanoton": 533324,
    "total_fee_nanoton": 3778124,
    "reported_total_nanoton": 3778124,
    "true_network_total_nanoton": 4844800,
    "transactions": 1
}

"Wallet V5 batch 12 messages": {
    "gas": 12826,
    "compute_fee_nanoton": 5130400,
    "storage_fee_nanoton": 0,
    "import_fee_nanoton": 3790400,
    "total_fwd_fees_nanoton": 4800000,
    "forward_only_nanoton": 3200028,
    "action_fee_nanoton": 1599972,
    "total_fee_nanoton": 10520772,
    "reported_total_nanoton": 10520772,
    "true_network_total_nanoton": 13720800,
    "transactions": 1
}

"Highload V3 batch 12 messages": {
    "gas": 7956,
    "compute_fee_nanoton": 3182400,
    "storage_fee_nanoton": 0,
    "import_fee_nanoton": 4096400,
    "total_fwd_fees_nanoton": 8552000,
    "forward_only_nanoton": 5701381,
    "action_fee_nanoton": 2850619,
    "total_fee_nanoton": 10129419,
    "reported_total_nanoton": 10129419,
    "true_network_total_nanoton": 15830800,
    "transactions": 2
}

Methodology

Sandbox measurements:

Framework: Blueprint + @ton/sandbox
Wallets: implementations from @ton/ton (V3R2, V4, V5R1) and Highload V3 sources
Test scenario: Simple transfer of 0.01 TON with PAY_GAS_SEPARATELY mode

On-chain measurements:

Network: TON testnet
Wallets: Same implementations as sandbox
Measurement: Actual transaction gas consumption from explorer data

Use case recommendations

Based on cost-effectiveness: For retail users (1-10 transactions/day):
  • Use V3 or V4 — most cost-effective for single transfers (2,994 gas baseline)
  • V5 adds 65% gas overhead for single transfers but provides modern features
  • Total cost difference negligible for low volume; choose based on feature needs
For moderate volume (10-100 transactions/day):
  • Use V5 for batch operations — 6% savings vs V3 for 12-message batches
  • Single V5 batch (255 msgs) more efficient than multiple V3/V4 batches
  • V5 supports up to 255 messages per transaction vs V3/V4 limit of 4
For high volume (100+ transactions/day):
  • Highload V3 becomes efficient with large batches
  • Designed for exchanges and payment processors (different processing approach)
  • Gas cost remains constant regardless of batch size (unlike V3/V4/V5)
  • Note: Uses 2-transaction approach resulting in ~1.8x higher forward fees
Gas comparison for batching:
  • Highload V3: 7956 gas per batch (flat cost regardless of batch size)
  • V5: ~1,069 gas/message for 12 messages (scales down with larger batches)
  • V3/V4: ~1,230 gas/message (limited to 4 messages per batch)

Code examples

Check gas-research and tolk-bench projects for code examples. Key features of the gas-research testing suite:
  • Comprehensive gas and fee breakdown analysis
  • Automated benchmarking across all wallet versions
  • Fee calculation helpers for precise cost analysis